What Were The Odds of Selling Your Seattle-Eastside Home in August, 2010?
The odds of selling a home on the Eastside in August, 2010 ranged from a low of 6% to a high of 21%, with an average 14% absorption rate. This month, West Bellevue is in the single digits, at 6%.
The real estate activity in the summer months has turned out to be very different than the activity in the spring. Clearly, both buyers and sellers rushed to buy and sell before the tax credit expired. We have a buyers’ market for most of the eastside again, which means buyers can choose from a variety of nice homes and probably not find other buyers competing with them.
(The absorption rate is the number of homes for sale in any given month divided by the actual number of homes sold that month.)
August, 2010 3492 homes for sale 491 homes sold 15% odds of selling.
July, 2010 3468 homes for sale 470 homes sold 13.5% odds of selling.
August, 2009 3604 homes for sale 580 homes sold 16% odds of selling.
_____________________________________________________________
August, 2009 Seattle-Eastside real estate market compared to August, 2010:
- The average price of pending homes (recently sold homes) went from $543,639 to $532,692. Some neighborhoods showed an increase in prices for the month.
- As of this past week, there were 14,333 King County homes (houses and condos) for sale, less than late July’s high of 14,639.
- Home sales on Seattle’s Eastside: down 2.5% from last August’s number.
- Number of homes for sale on Seattle’s Eastside: down 3% from last year.
- The reality is some homes are selling well, but it is only those homes priced well and showing well.
Best odds of selling: Redmond, near Microsoft, and East Bellevue.
Worst odds of selling: West Bellevue
Biggest increase in sales from last year: An 8% increase in home sales in Redmond, near Microsoft and East Bellevue.
Smallest increase in sales from last year: Same as above. This area had the only increase in Seattle-eastside home sales in August.
Decline in real estate sales from last year: There was a decline in 6 out of the 7 Seattle-eastside areas. West Bellevue had the largest decline in home sales with 65% decline in the number of homes sold.
The peak of homes for sale in 2008: July, 4370 homes.
The peak of homes for sale in 2009: June, 3859 homes.
The number of eastside homes for sale at the start of 2010: 2584 homes
The number of eastside homes for sale now: 3492 homes.
For a picture of King County sales, check out The Seattle Times.
How Did August, 2010 Seattle-Eastside Real Estate Sales Stack Up In Your Neighborhood?
[googlemaps http://maps.google.com/maps?source=s_q&hl=en&geocode=&q=Seattle-eastside&sll=47.709762,-122.011414&sspn=0.310487,0.911865&ie=UTF8&split=1&radius=21.22&rq=1&ev=zo&hq=Seattle-eastside&hnear=&ll=47.709762,-122.011414&spn=0.310487,0.911865&t=h&output=embed&w=425&h=350]
How did August, 2009 stack up to August, 2010 in your neighborhood?
(Click on the cities below to see real estate trends for the past 5 years. You’ll find the median pricing for each city and whether the number of homes for sale and the number of sales went up or down. The odds of selling a home in each area is a result of the number of homes for sale divided by the actual number of home sales.)
The plateau: Sammamish, Issaquah, North Bend, and Fall City
The odds of selling a home were 16%.
Median sales price decreased from $515,000 $479,895.
The number of homes for sale increased by 9% and sales were down by 17% from last year.
The odds of selling a home were 21%.
Median sales price increased to $494,900 from $475,000.
The number of homes for sale were up by 4% and sales were UP by 8%.
The odds of selling a home were 14%.
Median price increased to $550,000 from $499,500.
The number of homes for sale dropped by 13% and sales were down by 26%.
Woodinville/Bothell/Kenmore/Duvall/North Kirkland
The odds of selling a home were 13%.
Median price was down from $425,000 to $415,000.
The number of homes for sale declined by 2% and sales were down by 27%.
The odds of selling a home were 14%.
Median price increased to $641,000 from $581,919.
The number of homes for sale declined by 13% and sales were down by 27%.
The odds of selling a home were 6%.
Median pricing was down from $899,475 to $869,000.
The number of homes for sale decreased by 16% and sales decreased by 65%. (Ouch!)
Redmond/Education Hill/ Carnation
The odds of selling a home were 15%
Median pricing increased from $542,250 to $549,950.
The number of homes for sale increased by 12% and sales decreased by 10%.
Real estate sales numbers are down on Seattle’s eastside, with the exception of one area. The East Bellevue and Redmond area near Microsoft showed a slight increase in the number of homes sold. This area was also the only area to show an increase in median price, number of homes on the market (not so good), and number of homes sold. However, median pricing was up in 3 other areas, South Bellevue and Issaquah, Kirkland, and Redmond and Carnation.
The number of homes for sale on Seattle’s eastside is the highest for this year, but should be experiencing a downward swing as we head into fall. Right now, though, there are a lot of choices out there and not as many buyers to compete with. Good buys are out there if you take your time and check out the homes for sale.
What real estate activity have you seen in your neighborhood?
I'm Looking for a Tech Savvy Realtor in South Carolina
I’m looking for a Realtor in South Carolina, the Greer/Greenville area, to be exact. My mother-in-law is moving and I need a Realtor to sell her home.
Last week, I contacted a Realtor from a Realtor network I belong to, Certified Residential Specialists. When referrals are made through the CRS network, they are by phone or email, since the referral is to an area outside of Seattle. Rarely, do we meet the other agents. I’ve made many referrals over the years and had good luck as the agents with the CRS designation. They are long time agents who have had additional training and sell a certain numbers of homes each year, which means they’re experienced.
Since I was in South Carolina, I asked that this agent bring market statistics and her marketing plan to our meeting. The agent came armed with 3 pieces of paper, one was a chart showing me her company sold the most homes in the area, and the other two had brief, very brief, information about the sales activity of the homes in the area. Statistics? None. Marketing plan? Zip. Market analysis? Nada
I asked her about her marketing plan and heard newspaper and real estate magazine advertising. I told her to spend her money on the internet and professional marketing, including professional photos. No response to the professional photography. I did hear the usual, though, the listing would be on the company website, but I did not get much more.
I asked that she send me the complete listing information and photos of each of the homes included in her short list of homes. She assured me she would. Since it’s been two weeks since I met her, I doubt I will be getting that information. So she’s out.
We then contacted a personal referral who is a Realtor and also a CRS. However, she is having some surgery in the next few weeks so is not taking on any new business. We’re going to try another Realtor from a second personal referral next.
I turned to the internet. I’ve been online checking the local agents’ presence on the internet. I’m looking for how the agents market homes. I don’t bother to check the listings and agents who don’t use multiple photos when marketing a property. However, I’m finding that with multiple photos, most are just plain awful. Photos are dark, sometimes showing too much clutter, and don’t show the full room. Finding the agent who uses professional photos might be like finding that one in a million.
Since I belong to some real estate networks on LinkedIn.com, that’s my next stop.
Here’s what I’m looking for when I’m hiring a Realtor:
- Someone who knows the market and has statistics to back their information.
- Someone who completes a professional market analysis and gives me realistic information on pricing.
- A strong internet presence on multiple websites: A company website, Realtor.com, google, Zillow, Propsmart, Craig’s List, Oodle, etc. Dedicated website for the home.
- Video or tour of the home.
- Photos, video, or tours of the local sites and the town.
- Homes that are marketed when looking terrific, decluttered and staged
- Professional photography
- Nice property brochures with color photos
- Open houses, only if they work in the area
- Other creative marketing ideas
- Communicate with me on a weekly basis. I’d like an update on showings and the local real estate market. I’d like to know if the competition has changed. Has a competing home come on the market, reduced its price or sold?
This is the very level of service my mother-in-law should be getting.
Does anyone know a good Realtor in that area who can provide this service? Any ideas on how to find someone?
Don't Spend Money Greening Your Home Until…..
Are you feeling bombarded about “greening your home?‘ There’s so much stuff out there to absorb. There are articles flying around about all the good “green” things to do. Don’t get me wrong, I think reducing our carbon footprint, going green, and hopefully, saving money are all important.
But, I just recently came across two articles that look at the costs of going” green” more closely. Just because something is “green” doesn’t mean it truly reduces our carbon footprint or helps you to save you money. One of the biggest offenders is bamboo flooring. Since most bamboo is sourced in the Far East, the cost and impact on our carbon footprint for transporting bamboo may outweigh the fact that it’s a renewable resource.
During these crazy times it’s important to analyze how you spend your money on your home. It’s important to think about the payback to you and the environment, in addition to the payback for when you might sell, even if selling your home is in the future. Going “green” is important to consider, but according to some, there are different ways to handle going green.
Two recent posts on different blogs talked about this very issue. The Bigger Pockets blog listed 7 green items that could be a waste of money. I’m not sure I agree with all that is said. For example, CLF’s, Compact Fluorescent Bulbs are more expensive than standard light bulbs, but they are a fairly inexpensive way to reduce our carbon footprint. Sure they are more expensive than standard light bulbs and may become cheaper, but it’s important to start now and with CFL’s, it is a great place to start. From the EnergyStar website:
If every American home replaced just one light with a light that’s earned the ENERGY STAR, we would save enough energy to light 3 million homes for a year, save about $600 million in annual energy costs, and prevent 9 billion pounds of greenhouse gas emissions per year, equivalent to those from about 800,000 cars.
Other things, such as location, factor into making a “green” decision. Bigger Pockets felt solar panels were not efficient enough yet to warrant the cost. If you live in Seattle, it probably isn’t cost effective to install solar panels, especially with all the gray 65 degree days we’ve had this summer! However, in Southern California it makes perfect sense. I have a friend who installed solar panels and is receiving a substantial rebate for the first five years, plus a check from the utility company for helping to supply power back to the grid. The payback for these people will be 5-7 years. Not a bad return for a fairly expensive item. But these folks have no plans to move, so the investment should more than pay for itself over the years.
Worldchanging tackles this same subject with a video of how to “green” a new construction home and other thoughts about how to reduce our carbon footprint. The post mentions a book by Eric Corey Freed and Kevin Daum entitled “Green Sense for the Home: Rating the Real Payoff from 50 Green Home Projects.” The book is divided into three handy sections. The first covers things that can be done now, like using CFL’s or insulating a hot water tank, to more expensive changes like adding solar power and new windows, to building a “green” new home.
The bottom line is everyone should be thinking about making changes, both big and small to save energy and money. Some things work better for some people, homes, and locations than other “green” changes. It is important to decide what works for you. Do the research and make good decisions to maximize your dollar and to save energy.
What ways do you find to save energy and reduce your carbon footprint? If you’ve got some “green” tips, ideas, etc., please do share.
There's A Lot of Green Close to Downtown Bellevue WA
Bellevue, WA is “hot!” The city is showing up on lists for the best schools, best places to live, and it’s a neighbor of Seattle, one of the top places in the next decade. It’s clear Bellevue has a lot to offer. It’s got the economic vitality coupled with the beauty of lakes, the surrounding mountains, and wonderful green areas. Here’s a video of a walk in The Mercer Slough, a green area smack dab in the middle of Bellevue. (You can hear some road noise so you can tell you’re surrounded by greenery, but still in the city. Mercer Slough also has guided walks available on Saturday afternoons.
So even though the city ends up on a lot of “top” lists, it’s great to see some green maintained in the heart of the city. Take a walk down there and check it out. It’s a beautiful piece of nature for all to enjoy.
[googlemaps http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=en&geocode=&q=Mercer+Slough,+Bellevue,+WA&sll=37.0625,-95.677068&sspn=23.761683,58.359375&ie=UTF8&hq=&hnear=Mercer+Slough&ll=47.586255,-122.18688&spn=0.009841,0.028496&t=h&z=14&output=embed&w=425&h=350]






