Debra Sinick

Vote for Your Favorite Public Restroom, (hint Seattle’s Canlis)

In Seattle, not real estate on July 10, 2009 at 1:16 pm

Here’s a little fun for a Friday.  Public restrooms, “the final frontier,” according to the Wall Street Journal, and the place we worry about putting our derrieres, are up for a vote.   Here’s your chance to vote online for the best public restroom in the country. For the past 8 years, Cintas Corporation of Cinncinnati has sponsored a contest to identify the top public restroom from a list of 10 public restrooms in the country.  The Wall Street Journal ran the story about the contest and you can vote online for your pick. 

Seattle’s Canlis restaurant, not only one of the top restaurants in the city, also has one of the top restrooms in the country.  Canlis is on this year’s top ten list.  So take a moment and choose your top restroom.  I’m sure you’ll be totally impartial and not let a local Seattle icon influence you.  (Go  Canlis!)

Rebound in Seattle/Eastside real estate? Wait until 2012

In Bellevue Real Estate, For Homeowners, For Sellers, Issaquah Real Estate, King County Real Estate, Kirkland, Sammamish, WA Real Estate, Seattle real estate, Woodinville, WA Real Estate, real estate opinion on July 8, 2009 at 2:11 am

A rebound in Seattle real estate?  Yes, but not just yet, and it will probably be a small rebound, IMHO. Both Yahoo, via the Plugged in Finance blog and Businessweek had articles projecting a faster return to a more positive real estate market  for Seattle than for many other parts of the country.  Seattle ended up on the top 10 real estate rebound lists on both Yahoo and  Businessweek.

Why a rebound in Seattle? Seattle’s chances are among the best in the country and for the same reasons the Seattle/Eastside area was so strong for most of the last two decades.  It’s our economy and our geography.

First, the geography. (Bear with me for this brief geography lesson. This brings me back to my roots as a social studies teacher who loves geography.) If you click on the “view larger version” of the map below, you’ll notice a lot of empty space east of Monroe down to Fall City.  This is where the foothills of the Cascade Mountain range begins.  It looks like there’’s lots of  open space out there, and there is, but it gets pretty steep!

Couple this with strict land use regulations, protecting salmon streams as an example, and even less land is available for development.  It’s double-edged sword.  We need to maintain a healthy balance between people and nature, to maintain our wildlife, our trees, and our quality of life.   But the natural elements of the Seattle area, Puget Sound, Lake Washington, and  the Cascade Mountains do provide a challenge to our growth.   Less land to develop=higher prices , but it  won’t happen for a few years and increases should still be modest.


View Larger Map

The economy in the Seattle area is hurting like the rest of the country.  But there’’s a strong economic base that will re-emerge as things start to turn around.  The old stand-bys, Microsoft, Starbucks, and Boeing are struggling now, but should bounce back.

Another thing to watch is the number of homes for sale, the housing inventory.  We’re still at higher numbers, but things are starting to balance out. If you look at the maps, you’ll see the Seattle real estate market of 2009 is far more balanced than the Seattle real estate market of 2008. (A balance market is when the number of homes for sale in an area is less than a 6 months supply.  Yellow on the attached maps indicates a balanced market in the area.

Builders are NOT buying land right now. Over the years, builders would have huge amounts of land tied up for future building.  This is no longer the case.  It can take a couple of years to develop a site and to start building homes. With less land available for building and less land owned by builders and ready to be built out, existing homes will be more in demand in the future.

On yesterday’s “Morning Edition” on NPR Station, KPLU, John Maynard interviewed Richard Hagar about another issue, the influx of new people moving to Washington State, the majority of whom are moving to King County. Some of these people rent and some buy condos and homes.  The in-migration of people will only help our real estate and economy over time.

The year 2012 seems like a long way off, but we’re halfway through 2009.  It’s around a really long corner and but it’s not going to be an easy “walk” to get there.

Is A Hold On The New Real Estate Appraisal Rules, the HVCC, Coming?

In For Buyers, For Homeowners, Real Estate News, financing, real estate on July 7, 2009 at 6:47 am

Recently, I wrote about my experience with the “new and improved” real estate appraisal process, the HVCC, House Valuation Code of Conduct, a misguided attempt to right the wrongs of past appraisals.   The appraisal process needed to be revamped, but I’m not alone in seeing how difficult the new appraisal system has been for the consumerPetitions are online for people to ask that the HVCC be reevaluated.

Briefly, the HVCC requires all appraisals to go through a central clearing house.  The next appraiser on the list is assigned the job, regardless of experience and knowledge about an area.  The appraiser may live and work in an area hours away from the property. It’s very hard for anyone to know the individual nuances of a neighborhood, builders, school systems, etc. and how these affect value.  I can only imagine how hard it must be for appraisers to have to evaluate properties hither and yon.   How could anyone appraise properties in an area that’s the size of small states and get it right all of the time?

In addition,  appraisals cost buyers about the same as before, $450-500, but the portion of the fee directed to the appraiser has decreased. The appraisers only make about $200 and the rest of the fee goes to the appraisal management companies, which, by the way, are often owned by banks and title insurance companies.  This from Matt Carter at Inman News:

As originally proposed, the code would have barred lenders from ordering reports from appraisal management companies they owned more than a 20 percent stake in. But as adopted, the code does not limit lender ownership stakes in appraisal management companies.

What if your lender makes a mistake and your loan needs to go to a different lender?  Believe me, it happens and it happens to good, strong buyers.  Well, not only will your loan close late, you”ll be the proud owner of two appraisals. This from Matt Carter at Inman News again ( Joseph Heller would have had fun with this one):

The code allows lenders to accept an appraisal produced for another lender, for example, but only after the receiving lender obtains confirmation in writing from the original lender that the appraisal is in compliance with the code.

Because there is currently no industry or supervisory standard regarding what constitutes an adequate written confirmation of compliance with the code, Kittle said, lenders are reluctant to accept another lender’s appraisal because they might be forced to repurchase loans if they are found to have breached the code.

That means lenders “typically order a new appraisal at the expense of the borrower,” even if an appraisal has recently been performed by another lender, Kittle said.

I’ve heard of appraisals coming in late, causing the buyer to close late and lose their loan lock.  Imagine how difficult this is when you have movers sitting in your driveway and they are booked for weeks afterward.  I could go on, but this is a simplified version of the changes brought to the real estate industry by the HVCC.

Two US Representatives, Representative Travis Childers (D-Miss) and Gary Miller (R-CA),  have introduced a bill, HR 3044, to suspend the new HVCC code for 18 months, so it can be properly evaluated. This a good thing for consumers and the housing industry.  Changes to the appraisal system need to be done right, but not by implementing a system that creates more problems.   We must be fair to both buyers and sellers and make sure  appraisals are coming in on time and at the value that exists in the marketplace.

It’s important for you to contact your congress person to see this law is passed to help protect the integrity of the system and ensure changes to the appraisal system are a benefit, not a detriment.

Representative Jay Inslee (D – 01) 202-225-6311 202-226-1606 http://www.house.gov/inslee/contact/email.html
Representative Rick R. Larsen (D – 02) 202-225-2605 202-225-4420 http://www.house.gov/larsen/IMA/issue_subscribe.shtml
Representative Brian Baird (D – 03) 202-225-3536 202-225-3478 https://forms.house.gov/baird/webforms/issue_subscribe.htm
Representative Richard (Doc) Hastings (R – 04) 202-225-5816 202-225-3251 http://hastings.house.gov/ContactForm.aspx
Representative Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R – 05) 202-225-2006 202-225-3392 http://mcmorris.house.gov/?sectionid=82&sectiontree=482
Representative Norman D. Dicks (D – 06) 202-225-5916 202-226-1176 http://www.house.gov/dicks/email.shtml
Representative Jim McDermott (D – 07) 202-225-3106 202-225-6197 http://www.house.gov/mcdermott/contact.shtml
Representative Dave Reichert (R – 08) 202-225-7761 202-225-4282 http://reichert.house.gov/Contact/ZipAuth.htm
Representative Adam Smith (D – 09) 202-225-8901 202-225-5893 http://adamsmith.house.gov/Contact/